Benefits And Risks Of Bioengineered Foods Essay

Millions of people worldwide provoke consumed foods derived from ingredienttically engineered foods from cereals, breads, soybeans notwithstanding however thither were no facts and figures if these foods have unfavourable effect to human. In relation, this short research pass on look into the risks and possibilities of bioengineered foods while state the question Are genetically engineered foods safe to sap? Different arguments be presented to give the benefits or risks of the GE foods. This study pull up stakes look into the risks to the environment, health, economy.Laws and rules on GE foods leave also be discussed in this study (Schardt 42). Bioengineered sets were get-go discovered by Gregor Mendel, a geneticist, when he experimented to insert a gene from a pea plant with better traits into another pea. Results showed that the plant is much resistant to any diseases. This was the start of bioengineered crops and later foods (Gorman, 56). Some of the bioengineered crops be soybeans, corn, cotton, potatoes, and dairy farm and animal products. Experiments were done making a more(prenominal) competitive crop making it into competitive by-products (S play outtle, WA, pp2).In Canada, at that place atomic number 18 5. 8 zillion hectargons penninged to be planted with GE crops and considered as one of the sort out producers of bioengineered foods in the world. From this figure, on that point ar 820,000 hectargons devoted to GE corn which a lot of by-products atomic number 18 made of (Gorman, 100). The Impacts On Health The most third estate crop that is drug abused in genetic engineering is the corn. Many of what we eat in the breakfast, lunch, dinner or snacks is a by-product of corn and these ar sweeteners, cereals, starch, oil and syrups (Robinson 110-120). entirely despite the usefulness of the corn in the occasional habit there had been news that these foods ar believed to be genetically engineered (GE) foods. Issues flood t ide from various organizations opposing GE foods argon all over the profit and papers. The issue here is that GE foods are not safe for consumption of human (Robinson 110-120). In a study done in un tried and true Zealand, where finks were used to feed with the foods believed to be GE foods, it created confusion among scientists, businessmen and farmers.The rat that ate the food had problems with their liver and blood circulation. Oppositions pointed out to the companies that there actually are effects of the GE foods onto animals. If this is the case how much more if this is consumed by the whole population in the US (Rifkin 34-38). In Europe, GE foods are starting to be banned by the government. People opposing the procession of the GE foods wrote press releases stating that these are harmful to the health and cogency wee allergens to well-nigh who are not used eating this kind of food. some other argument was that wherefore test it with the animals when humans will consum e the GE foods (Pusztai 7-10). But all of the issues are debunked by the companies producing the GE foods. According to the companies, the enzymes that are inserted into the crops are good for the health. These enzymes are proteins that are essential to human health. They however stated that this will only be harmful if this is not matched with the genes of the person who ate the GE foods (Cummins and Lilliston 48-50). On EnvironmentGood environment is what makes the world livable for humans and animals. Altering it will create mental unsoundness to the ecosystem. The production of genetically modified crops requires big lands suitable for planting (Anderson 20). Since the crops are equipped with genes that are resistant to any diseases chemical composition is embodied in the seed crops. Planting these seed crops will alter the medical dressing of the soil (Shiva 20-25). The farmers will still be using chemical more since they hold up that these will not be absorbed by the pla nt.The unfathomed application of chemical can build air pollution which might be harmful to the plants surrounding it and to the people applying it. (World Wildlife Fund, Canada, F4). The companies suggested that while the farmers are using the seed crop they should have the gears so that they will not be harmed while planting and spraying chemicals. But this argument still should have a basis in order to encourage farmers to plant genetically modified crops. Because if the nature will be altered we cannot reverse it any longer into an environment we sine qua noned for the future generations (Robinson 22-25).On Economy One of the benefits that are seen by the seed companies producing the GE foods is the increase in the income of farmers since most of these crops are high in demand but low in supply. That is why the companies tried to look for an answer in the world market where there are problems with decreasing supply and the difficulty of farmers to supply it all. The companies and the scientists saw the motivating to experiment in order to increase the supply and even increase jobs for people (Rifkin 55).Some of the benefits laid down by the companies For one, using genetically modified crops in their farms will ensure increase in plunk for and profit. Why is this so? In using these seed crops, farmers will use lesser dose of pesticides and herbicides since the seeds and crops that are used in planting are equipped with genes that are resistant to any disease and reaction. Inputs are genuinely high in price so this is one way of tell to the burdens of farmers (Pusztai 60). Not only that chemical and pesticide costs will be decreased but also labor costs that usually have larger part in the pie.Fewer workers will be tapped to work in the farm since this will not require a lot of maintenance. This will only mean that decrease in their inputs will have high profit. In any case farmers are still faced with problems in the farm such as higher credit l ine to the companies that are responsible of producing the GM crops. Even if the farmers are aware of the disadvantages of planting GM crops they still want to try using these kinds of seed crops because all they truly want is to make high profit they can boast of (Schardt 33-34). Labelling and interrogatoryLaws and Rules Different arguments have been laid by the oppositions and the companies that produce these seed crops and GE foods. The question here now is who should be responsible in ensuring that the foods eaten by the people are safe and no side-effects? The company sees to it that the responsible stakeholders will impart their knowledge and share their part in making the grounding of the GE foods successful. In cooperation with US FDA these GE products are carefully tested and labelled in order to inform the consumers that these are GE products (Schardt 45).The US Food and Drug Administration sees to it that the products sold in the market are safe for consumers oddly t hat today many of the products are said to be imitations and used different ingredients harmful to the health (Schardt, 45). In fact, one of the depute tasks of FDA is to carefully analyse the enzymes inserted in the crop or product so that this will not create a problem in the market later on. Assessment of each protein present is truly important because this will affect the body of the consumer of the certain product.According to FDA, they have been constantly in contact with the companies producing such GE products because they want that the consumers will not bear the harmful effects of GE products (Gorman, 33-56). But in most cases, some of the GE foods have been found not properly tested. If this is the case there will be problems later in the health of human especially that effects of GE products were recorded to be fatal in the lives of human. But the problem here is that these effects will not be translucent in short period of time but will be felt at the later part.Stil l these effects are still unknown and how is it going to be cured or prevented. The groups are proposing that there should be proper and adequate testing in order to know its side effects to animals and humans (Schardt, 47-48). Conclusion The issues on GE foods suffer a great challenge to the scientists and companies who are capable of producing the products. Of course they want to compete with the global market and simply increase the income of farmers. But there is always a causal effect on the part of consumers. They are faced with different perspectives from different groups all over the world.Producing this much is very religious serviceful in food security of a country but when it comes to harmful effects these should be looked into by the companies. There should be no disadvantaging with the profits and gains but should be vigilant how these products can be of help to the country. The promotion of organically grown products is taking into the limelight. This might be a good option and alternative for all who wants to have healthy modus vivendi in the coming years.Works Cited Anderson, Luke. Genetic Engineering, Food and our Environment. Chelsea Green publication Company, Vermont, U. S.A White River Junction, 1999 Cummins Ronnie Lilliston, Ben. Genetically Engineered Food A Self-Defense Guide for Consumers. pertly York Marlowe and Company, 2000 Do Genetically-Engineered (GE) Crops Reduce Pesticides? The Emerging Evidence Says not Likely. Spring, 2000. A report by the World Wildlife Fund, Canada. GORMAN, Paul. Govt rules GE corn fit for people to eat GENETICALLY ENGINEERED FODDER Corn type may produce unique food hazards The Press. 2007 Pusztai, Arpad. Genetically Modified Foods Are They a Risk to gay/Animal Health? American Institute of Biological Sciences, 2001.