Nature vs nurture Essay

thither has always been a openhanded debate on nature verses call forth. It is a debate that is still vent on today. Many psychologist and other professions still savouring make an sympathy for iodin or the other. I believe that is it both nature and heighten because it cannot be just one overpowering the other. I believe that both nature and nurture intertwine with one another for e very gracious since birth. Psychologists such as Erickson believed that nature determines the sequence of the stages and it sets the limits within which nurture operates. plainly is this really true? To me it felt that Erickson believed it intertwined some but he was to a greater extent than on the nature side more than. I dont call nature determines it mainly because nurture could do the same thing. It depends on the situation. adept of the psychologists that I agree with the most is Vygotsky. Vygotsky is a developmental psychologist. Most developmental psychologist believe that nature and nurture combine to influence development, biological chemical element defend a stronger berth in some aspects of development, such as physical development, and environmental factors playing a stronger role in others, such as moral development. His theories ar theories that seem to be more relat able and accessible than the other psychologist who are leaning more to nature or more to nurture. Vygotsky views on cognitive development was Intellectual development can just be understood in terms of a childs historical and cultural context. Also, Development depends on the sign frames that individuals have ready(prenominal) to them. Vygotsky assumed that adults could convey children finished conversations how their culture interpret and respond to the world. He believed that every culture has transmitted physical and cognitive tools that are use in daily lives. He believed that thoughts and languages become more interdependent in the first five old age of a childs life. There are complex mental processes that begin as a accessible activity and child are able to transform the processes that they use in a social activity in their confess internalization of activity. He believed that children can perform more challenging activities when they have someone in that respect to help them who are more competent (Ormrod,2008). Around the same cartridge clip Vygotsky was doing this making his own theories, there was another man who was from Russia as easily named, Piaget, who had his own ideas. Piaget and Vygotsky were similar in some ways but they in addition had some differences. Piaget assumed that children are active and motivated learners. He faces that children are curious about their surroundings. He assumed that children construct knowledge through experience. He believed that they gained this by the physical and social environment, which is critical for cognitive growth. Piaget had his own stages of cognitive development. The first one is sensor imotor, which occurs from birth until the toddler is two years of age. Sensorimotor is when they start forming object permanence and they have progress from reflexive pronoun to goal-oriented behavior. Second, the preoperational stage which is from age two to seven years old. This is when they develop the mightiness to use symbol to represent an object. Third, is concrete operational from ages seven to eleven years of age. They are thinking more logically in this stage. They are less egocentric. Lastly, it is formal operation which starts at eleven and goes to adulthood. They are able to think abstract and can solve problems through a system of experimenting (Ormrod, 2008). I believe what Piaget and Vygotsky had implanted because when I am talking to piffling kids, it is easier to talk to them to see how they see things. Having that open communication as an adult, I get a feeling on where they are coming from and try to go from there. They are things that the environment cannot teach a child. I feel there are things that are already innate in them slice they were in the womb and after they came out. It is very hard to choose that one conquers the other because they play out equally. Weather it is nature or nurture, it is very important when it comes to human development. It is very clear that they play a turgid role in everyday life and it will continue to play a role until the day that we pass away. I am a firm believer that both nature and nurture plays a role in life. Everything that Piaget and Vygotsky said is very true. Even other psychologists that are more on the nature side or more on the nurture side, they all bring valid points.ReferencesOrmrod, J. E. (2008). Educational Psychology Developing Learners, 6th. upper berth Saddle, NJPearson. Merrill, Prentice-Hall.Slavin, R. (2003). Educational Psychology Theory and Practice and Practice, 7th.Boston, MA Allyn and Bacon.Miller, P. (1983). Theories of developmental Psychology. San Francisco W.H.Free man and Company. Santrock, J.(1996). Child Development. Dubuque, IA Brown and Benchmark Publishers.