Explain Advantages and Disadvantages of the Process of Amending the Constitution

Explain utilitys and disadvantages of the process of amending the constitution 15 marks thither process of amending the US constitution is a long process with split up of checks and balances created by the founding fathers this was to limit radical and frequent amendments. The first straggle of the process is proposing an amendment this can be done in two ways, first dispatch by having two-thirds of both rest homes of theUnited States Congressagree to the proposal, or by anational conventionassemblight-emitting diode at the request of thelegislaturesof at least two-thirds of thestates agreeing to the proposal.To have a proposed amendment become part of the US constitution the proposed amendment require to ratified, by having either ? of the states (38 states) agree to ratify the proposal or by holding state ratifying conventions in ? of the states, however this method has only been utilise once.One advantage of the process of amending the constitution is that it protects the constitution from frequent substitute to do with popular opinion, it performer that to amend the constitution the amendment has to be sensible and necessary at non something to be taken lightly, this can be shown by the fact that the constitution has only been amended 27 clock times which shows mixture is possible still not too easy that it changes the historic set that America was built upon, helps control one party controlling power.This is an advantage as it means that when a party comes into power (e. g. republicans) they cannot go and fill lots of amendments that benefit them or are in their opinion, as the house of representatives usually as around 50/50 republican democrats coincidence and you need 2/3 to have a proposal accepted. The trunk is democratic as 38/50 must agree which means its fair and reduces the chance of lots of unnecessary changes.One Disadvantage is that the process is time consuming which means that if an amendment is popular with the public e. g . banning guns due to change magnitude gun crime then it may be rejected by republicans which means it a no, however this was the point when the constitution was created, and was purposely do difficult to amend. However some would argue that its so serious to amend that it cannot move with the modern times freely.Another disadvantage is that because of the difficulties of amending the constitution it has led to the supreme court assuming the role, this is when the supreme court rules on a case that something is unconstitutional which means that local governments can decide whether to utilize their decisions. In an extreme case if amendment proposals are constantly being rejected then a new constitution may branch off to create these new amendments in a separate constitution wiping let out the existing one.In conclusion the process of amending the constitution is a long and windy one but it kneads sure that an amendment has to be supported by a large percentage and something t hat should be taken seriously, this means that there is not lots of amendments which could jeopardise the historic values of the American constitution, and also make the nation less stable as there is constant change which could confuse people. Lastly the process of amending the constitution is confusing and frustrating but without it America could be changed radically very quickly.